Two boundary scan cell switches controlling input to output buffer

ABSTRACT

A process initializes the state of an output memory circuit of a scan cell located at the boundary of a logic circuit within an integrated circuit. Data is scanned into an input memory circuit of the cell while maintaining the cell in a mode providing normal operation of the logic circuit. The cell is placed in a test mode that disables normal operation of the logic circuit. The data scanned into the input memory circuit is transferred into the output memory circuit simultaneous with the placing the cell in the test mode. A transmission gate between the logic circuit and the output memory circuit and a transmission gate between the input memory circuit and the output memory circuit effect the changes between normal operation and test modes.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/773,784,filed Feb. 6, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,231,566, issued Jun. 12, 2007;

which was a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/686,709, filed Oct.11, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,694,465, granted Feb. 17, 2004;

which was a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/154,381, filed Sep.16, 1998, now abandoned;

which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/949,429, filed Oct.14, 1997, now abandoned;

which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/910,536, filed Jul.24, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,859,860, granted Jan. 12, 1999;

which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/711,137, filed Sep.9, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,701,307, granted Dec. 23, 1997;

which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/357,476, filed Dec.16, 1994, now abandoned.

The subject matter of the present application is related to subjectmatter disclosed in the following co-assigned, U.S. Patent documentswhich are incorporated herein by reference: application Ser. No.08/358,128, filed Dec. 16, 1994, now abandoned; application Ser. No.08/342,525, filed Nov. 21, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,732,091, issuedMar. 24, 1998; and application Ser. No. 08/342,948, filed Nov. 21, 1994,now U.S. Pat. No. 5,715,254, issued Feb. 3, 1998.

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs) and, moreparticularly, to boundary scan cells implemented at input and outputpins of ICs to simplify testing of the ICs and their wiringinterconnections.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Boundary scan testing is very well known in the art and is supported byan IEEE standard (IEEE 1149.1) which details its implementation andoperation modes. FIG. 1 illustrates the logic arrangement of a prior artboundary scan cell for use in boundary scan testing at IC outputs. Theboundary scan cell contains an input multiplexer (Mux1), a capture/shiftmemory (Mem1) such as a flip-flop or other latch circuit, an outputmemory (Mem2) such as a flip-flop or other latch circuit, and an outputmultiplexer (Mux2). Mux1 is controlled by a select signal (Select 1) toallow Mem1 to load data from either the serial data input or the systemdata output by the IC core logic. Mem1 loads data in response to acontrol signal (Control 1). The output of Mem1 is input to Mem2 and isoutput as serial data. Mem2 loads data from Mem1 in response to acontrol signal (Control 2). Mux2 is controlled by a select input (Select2) to allow it to output to the IC's output buffer either the output ofMem2 or the system data from the IC core logic. A plurality of theseboundary scan cells can be connected serially, via the serial input andoutput lines, to form a boundary scan register.

In FIG. 1, the output boundary scan cell logic is enclosed in dottedlines. The boundary scan cell connects an output from the IC's corelogic to the IC's output buffer. The output buffer outputs a high (V+)or low (G) voltage in response to the logic level it receives from Mux2.The boundary scan cell is realized in the same region of the IC as thecore logic, i.e., the core region. In most instances, i.e. whenimplemented in accordance with the rules stated in the IEEE 1149.1standard, the boundary scan cell logic is dedicated for test purposesand is not shared with system logic functions. In this way, the boundaryscan cell can be accessed for non-intrusive test operations withoutdisturbing the IC's normal functional operation.

The IEEE 1149.1 standard defines three types of test operations forboundary scan cells, a sample test operation (Sample), an external test(Extest) and internal test (Intest). Sample is a required test mode for1149.1. During Sample, the IC is in normal operation (i.e. IC's corelogic is connected to the output buffers via Mux2) and Mux1 and Mem1 areoperated to capture and shift out normal IC output data. Extest isanother required test mode for 1149.1. During Extest, output boundaryscan cells are used to drive test data from IC outputs onto wiringinterconnects, and input boundary scan cells are used to capture thedriven test data at IC inputs. In this way, Extest can be used to testwiring interconnects between IC inputs and outputs on a board Intest isan optional test mode for 1149.1. During Intest, input boundary scancells are used to drive test data to the IC's core logic, and outputboundary scan cells are used to capture the response from the corelogic. In this way, Intest can be used to test IC core logic.

During normal IC operation, the output of the IC's core logic passesthrough Mux2, to the output buffer, and is driven off the IC by theoutput buffer. Therefore, during normal mode, the IC output function isnot effected by the boundary scan cell, except for the delay introducedby Mux2. If, during normal operation, a Sample is performed, theboundary scan cell receives Select 1 and Control 1 input to capturesystem data and shift it out for inspection via the serial output.

During test operation, the output of the ICs core logic is received bythe boundary scan cell for capturing and shifting, but Mux2 iscontrolled by Select 2 to output the test data stored in Mem2 to theoutput buffer. Therefore, during test mode, the IC core logic outputfunction is disabled by the boundary scan cell. If, during testoperation, an Extest or Intest is performed, the boundary scan cellreceives Select 1 and Control 1 inputs to capture system data into Mem1and shift it out for inspection via the serial output. While Mem1 iscapturing and shifting data, Mem2 outputs stable test data to the outputpin. After Mem1 has completed its capture and shift operation in Extestit contains new test data to be loaded into Mem2. Mem2 loads the newtest data from Mem1 in response to a signal on Control 2. After Mem2receives the new test data, it is output from the IC via Mux2 and theoutput buffer. The purpose for Mem2 is to latch the IC's output at adesired test logic state while Mem1 is capturing and shifting data.Without Mem2, i.e. if the output of Mem1 were connected to Mux2directly, the IC's output would transition between logic (i.e. ripple)states as data is captured into and shifted through Mem1.

Examples of the boundary scan cell of FIG. 1 performing Sample, Extestand Intest operations are illustrated in the timing diagram of FIG. 1A.In the timing diagram of FIG. 1A and all following timing diagrams, “C”indications on the Control 1 and Control 2 signals indicate alow-high-low signal sequence which; in the example circuits shown,provides the control to store data into Mem1 and Mem2, respectively.Logic zero and one levels on the Select 1 and Select 2 signals indicatelogic levels used to control the operation of Mux5 and Mux2,respectively. Also, seven Control 1 “C” signals are used in all exampletiming diagrams. The first Control 1 “C” signal indicates the capture ofdata into Mem1, and the following six Control “C” signals represent theshifting of data through six serially connected boundary scan cellcircuits.

In FIG. 2, a known improvement to the boundary scan cell of FIG. 1 isshown. The improvement is brought about by realizing Mux2 in the bufferregion of the IC's output buffer. Relocating test logic in the IC bufferregion frees up area in the IC's core logic for system (non-test) logicfunctions. The logic required in the IC's core region is reduced by thesize of Mux2 for each required output boundary scan cell. This leavesonly the boundary scan cell's Mux1, Mem1, and Mem2 as test logicoverhead in the IC's core region. The amount of boundary scan cell logicthat needs to be placed and routed in the IC's core region is reduced.The boundary scan cell of FIG. 2 operates exactly like the one of FIG.1.

FIG. 3 illustrates another known improvement to the boundary scan cellof FIG. 1. This improvement was described in 1990 by D. Bhavsar on pages183-189 of IEEE Society Press Publication “Cell Designs that Help TestInterconnection Shorts”. The improvement allows the logic output fromthe output buffer to be captured and shifted out of Mem1 during Extest.This feature allows detecting shorts between pins or to supply voltagesor ground that conflict with the logic level attempting to be driven outof the output buffer. For example, during Extest, if a logic one isdriven from Mem2 the output buffer will attempt to drive out a logicone. However, if the output of the output buffer is shorted to ground ahigh current (or low impedance) path exists in the output buffer from V+through the top transistor to ground, which can result in a damaged ordestroyed output buffer. Similarly if Mem2 is driving out a logic zeroand the output of the output buffer is shorted to a supply voltage, ahigh current (low impedance) path exists through the bottom transistorto ground (G), again resulting in a damaged or destroyed output buffer.The boundary scan cell of FIG. 3 allows detecting these short circuitconditions by the addition of a third multiplexer (Mux3), a third selectinput (Select3), and an input buffer. The input buffer inputs the logicstate at the output of the output buffer. Mux3 inputs the system dataand the logic state of the output buffer, via the input buffer, andoutputs a selected one of these signals to one input of Mux1. In thisexample, Mux3 selects the system logic if Select 3 is low (Intest) orthe output buffer state if Select 3 is high (Extest). In this way, Mem1captures and shifts system data from the IC's core logic during Sampleand Intest, and test data from the input buffer during Extest.

Examples of the boundary scan cell of FIG. 3 in Sample, Extest, andIntest operation are illustrated in the timing diagram of FIG. 3A Theboundary scan cell of FIG. 3 also allows reducing the time that anoutput can be shorted. In the timing diagram of FIG. 3B, it is seen thatafter a full Extest operation, Extest 1 (i.e. the Capture & Shift ofMem1 and the Updating of Mem2), a short Extest operation, Extest 2 (i.e.the Capture Only of Mem1 (no shift) and Update of the captured data toMem2), can be performed. The Extest 2 operation allows test data fromthe output to be updated into Mem2 to correct any voltage conflict onthe output. For example, if the Extest 1 operation had attempted tooutput a logic one on the output buffer, with the IC output shorted toground, and the Extest 2 operation captured and updated a logic zero(due to the short to ground), the amount of time the output buffer wasin the high current situation (V+ to G through top transistor) isreduced to the number of TCK periods it takes to go from the update stepof Extest 1 to the update step of Extest 2, TCK being, for example, thetest clock of IEEE 1149.1. The next full Extest operation (Extest 3)captures and shifts out the logic zero to indicate the short to groundand the resulting change in state of Mem2, brought about by the shortExtest operation (Extest 2). If no short to ground existed, then theExtest 2 operation would have reloaded Mem2 with the logic one from theExtest 1 operation, and the Extest 3 operation would have verified thelogic one at the IC output.

While this approach reduces the amount of time a voltage conflict canexist at an IC output, the time it takes to execute the correctiveExtest scan operations, i.e. Extest 1 to Extest 2 update times in FIG.3B, may still endanger the output buffer. Also when the IC is firstpowered up in its normal mode, output conflicts due to shorts can existfor an extended amount of time before a test mode is entered, if enteredat all. So while the boundary scan cell of FIG. 3 does provide shortcircuit detection and correction improvements over the one in FIG. 1, itrequires time to make the corrections and does not provide protection atpower up where the IC immediately enters its normal operation. Also theboundary scan cell of FIG. 3 requires an additional Mux3, Select 3signal, and input buffer to achieve the short circuit detection andcorrection feature.

It is desirable in view of the foregoing to implement at least thefunctionality of the prior art boundary scan cells using less of the ICcore area. To this end, the present invention: provides a boundary scancell that requires less logic in the IC core region than prior artboundary scan cells; utilizes the IC output buffer as part of outputboundary scan cells, and the IC input buffer as part of input boundaryscan cells; provides latchable input and output buffer circuits thatserve the function of Mem2 in the prior art boundary scan cells;integrates the functions of Mux2 and Mem2 into IC input and outputbuffers to facilitate boundary scan cell logic reduction in the IC coreregion; provides a boundary scan cell and output buffer combination thatcan immediately and asynchronously detect and correct short circuitconditions on output pins during Extest operation; provides a boundaryscan cell and output buffer combination that can immediately andasynchronously detect and correct short circuit conditions on outputpins when the IC is initially powered up in its normal mode; andprovides an IC power up method and procedure that prevents IC outputbuffers from being damaged or destroyed by short circuits.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1-3 illustrate prior art output boundary scan cell structures.

FIG. 1A includes three timing diagrams which illustrate three differenttest operations performed by the prior art output boundary scan cellstructure of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3A includes three timing diagrams which illustrate three differenttest operations performed by the prior art output boundary scan cellstructure of FIG. 3.

FIG. 3B includes three timing diagrams which illustrate a sequence oftest operations performed by the prior art output boundary scan cellstructure of FIG. 3 to detect and correct for short circuits at the ICoutput.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary output boundary scan cell structureaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 4A includes two timing diagrams which illustrate two different testoperations performed by the output boundary scan cell structure of FIG.4.

FIG. 4B includes a timing diagram which illustrates another testoperation performed by the output boundary scan cell structure of FIG.4.

FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary circuitry for realizing the transmissiongates of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 illustrates another exemplary output boundary scan cell structureaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 6A includes three timing diagrams which illustrate three differenttest operations performed by the output boundary scan cell structure ofFIG. 6.

FIG. 6B includes two timing diagrams which illustrate two additionaltest operations performed by the output boundary scan cell structure ofFIG. 6.

FIG. 7 illustrates a prior art output boundary scan cell structure foruse with a three-state output.

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary output boundary scan cell structureaccording to the present invention for use with a three-state output.

FIG. 9 illustrates a prior art input boundary scan cell structure.

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary input boundary scan cell structureaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 11 illustrates another exemplary input boundary scan cell structureaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a modification to the structure of FIG. 4 to permitsafe power up of an IC whose outputs are shorted.

FIG. 13 illustrates a modification of the structure of FIG. 6 to permitsafe power up of an IC whose outputs are shorted.

FIG. 14 illustrates another exemplary output boundary scan cellstructure according to the present invention.

FIG. 15 illustrates another exemplary output boundary scan cellstructure according to the present invention.

FIG. 16 illustrates another exemplary output boundary scan cellstructure according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIGS. 4 and 6 illustrate exemplary output boundary scan cells accordingto the invention, containing all the features of the prior art outputboundary scan cells of FIGS. 1-3 plus an improved short circuitdetection and correction method, while requiring significantly lesslogic in the IC's core region. The boundary scan cells of FIGS. 4 and 6provide the following improvements over prior art output boundary scancells; (1) increased boundary scan cell functionality, (2) reducedboundary scan cell logic overhead, and (3) improved output buffer shortcircuit protection. The boundary scan cell of FIG. 4 is designed toperform only the required 1149.1 Sample and Extest operations, whereasthe boundary scan cell of FIG. 6 is designed to perform the requiredSample and Extest operations, as well as the optional Intest operation.

In FIG. 4, the boundary scan cell logic includes Mux1, Mem1, twotransmission gates (TG1 and TG2), and a latch buffer. While transmissiongates are used in FIG. 4, other signal transfer or switching elementscould also be used, such as tristatable buffers. Examples of atransmission gate arrangement and a tristatable buffer that could serveas TG1 and TG2 are shown in FIG. 5. The Mem2 function of the prior artis realized by the combination of the IC output buffer, the latchbuffer, and TG2. The Mem2 function and IC core logic thus share use ofthe IC output buffer. The Mux2 function of the prior art examples isrealized by TG1 and TG2. The output of the IC output buffer is connectedto the input of the latch buffer. The output of the latch buffer isconnected to the input of the output buffer. In this arrangement, alatchable output buffer 40 is obtained when TG1 and TG2 are disabled.The latching operation is realized by the latch buffer feedback whichallows the output of the output buffer to drive the input of the outputbuffer.

In normal operation of the IC, TG1 is enabled to pass system data to theinput of the output buffer, and TG2 is disabled. In test operation ofthe IC, TG2 is enabled to pass test data from Mem1 to the input of thelatchable output buffer 40 (which serves as Mem2), and TG1 is disabled.The latch buffer is designed with a weak enough output so that when TG1or TG2 is enabled, either can overdrive the output of the latch buffer.However, when TG1 and TG2 are disabled, the output from the latch bufferis sufficient to maintain at the output buffer's input a logic level fedback from the IC output, thus providing a latching feature whichperforms the Mem2 function. If desired, one or both of TG1 and TG2 couldbe realized in the IC's output buffer region, to further reduce theamount of boundary scan cell logic in the IC's core region to as littleas Mux1 and Mem1. The positions of the Mux2 and Mem2 functions arereversed in FIG. 4 as compared to the prior art examples in FIGS. 1-3,i.e. the Mem2 function (TG2, latch buffer, and output buffer) appearsafter the Mux2 function (TG1 and TG2).

During Sample operation, the IC is in normal mode wherein Select 2enables TG1 and Control 2 disables TG2. The Control 2 signal is notactive during normal operation and remains low to disable TG2. One wayof keeping Control 2 inactive would be to gate it off with the Select 2signal during normal operation. In normal operation mode, the output ofthe IC's core logic (system data) passes through TG1 to be input to thelatchable output buffer 40 and driven off the IC. Therefore, duringnormal operation, the IC output function is not affected by the boundaryscan cell, except for the delay introduced by TG1. During Sample, theboundary scan cell receives Select 1 and Control 1 input to firstcapture into Mem1 the system data output from TG1 to Mux1, and thenshift the captured data out for inspection via the serial output. Theprior art cells capture system data entering Mux2 during Sample, whereasthe boundary scan cell of FIG. 4 captures system data leaving TG1. Anexample of the boundary scan cell in Sample operation is illustrated inthe timing diagram of FIG. 4A This timing diagram is the same as the onefor the prior art cells, except that Control 2 remains low during normaloperations (and thus during Sample) to insure that TG2 does not becomeenabled.

During Extest operation, Select 2 disables TG1, therefore disabling theIC core logic from outputting data to the latchable output buffer 40.When the boundary scan cell of FIG. 4 is first placed into Extestoperation, the latchable buffer 40 needs to be loaded with the outputfrom Mem1. To achieve this, a preload signal is output on Control 2 tocause TG2 to be enabled to drive the logic value from Mem1 to thelatchable output buffer 40. After the preload signal on Control 2 goesaway, TG2 is disabled and the latch buffer is used to maintain the logicvalue at the IC output. This preloading of the latchable output bufferis required the first time the cell is placed in Extest operation mode.After the initial preload operation is performed, all other logictransfers from Mem1 to the latchable output buffer will occur as theMem1 to Mem2 transfers were described in the prior art boundary scancells, i.e. in response to Control 2 input.

In Extest operation mode, the output of the latch buffer is input toMux1 for capturing and shifting while the latchable output 40 bufferoutputs stable test data. Connecting Mux1 to the output of the latchbuffer allows observation of the IC output as in the prior art boundaryscan cell of FIG. 3. During Extest operation, the boundary scan cellreceives Select 1 and Control 1 input to capture the IC output pin datainto Mem1 and then shift it out for inspection via the serial output.While Mem1 is capturing and shifting data, TG2 is disabled by Control 2to allow the latchable output buffer 40 to maintain stable test data atthe output pin. After Mem1 has completed its capture and shift operationit contains new test data to be loaded into the latchable output buffer40. The latchable output buffer 40 Loads the new test data from Mem1 viaTG2 in response to a signal on Control 2. When the latchable outputbuffer 40 receives new test data, the data is output directly to theoutput pin. Mem2 of the prior art cells outputs new test data to theoutput pin by first passing the data through Mux2, i.e. not directly tothe output buffer. An example of the boundary scan cell in Extestoperation is illustrated in the timing diagram of FIG. 4A. Note that thepreload signal on Control 2, described above to initially transfer thelogic value from Mem1 to the latchable output buffer 40 at the beginningof the Extest operation, is not shown in the FIG. 4A timing diagram, buthas already occurred when the Extest operation of FIG. 4A is entered.Note also that the cell of FIG. 4 does not require the additional Mux3and Select 3 signal required in the prior art cell of FIG. 3 to performthe short circuit detection and correction feature.

In FIG. 6, the boundary scan cell logic includes Mux1, Mem1, threetransmission gates (TG1, TG2, and TG3), and a latch buffer. The boundaryscan cells of FIG. 4 and FIG. 6 are identical except for the inclusionin FIG. 6 of TG3 between the outputs of TG1 and TG2 and the input to thelatchable output buffer 40. While TG1 and TG2 can be any type of signaltransfer element as shown for example in FIG. 5, TG3 must be able totransmit signals bi-directionally. So TG3 would need to operate as thetransmission gate example of FIG. 5, or some other type ofbi-directional signal transfer element. The reason for thebi-directional behavior of TG3 is discussed below. One or more of TG1,TG2, and TG3 could be implemented as part of the latchable output buffer40 in the IC's output buffer region to reduce the amount of test logicin the IC core region to as little as Mux1 and Mem1.

In normal operation of the IC, TG1 and TG3 are enabled to pass systemdata to the input of the output buffer, and TG2 is disabled. In testoperation of the IC, TG2 and TG3 are enabled to pass test data from Mem1to the input of the output buffer, and TG1 is disabled. When TG3 isenabled it overdrives the output of the latch buffer to pass system ortest data to the output pin. When TG3 is disabled, the latch buffermaintains feedback from the IC output to the input of the output bufferto latch and hold test data at the output pin.

During Sample operation, the IC is in normal mode wherein Select 2enables TG1, a Transfer signal enables TG3, and Control 2 disables TG2.In normal operation mode, the output of the IC's core logic passesthrough TG1 and TG3 to be output from the latchable output buffer 40.During Sample, the boundary scan cell receives Select 1 and Control 1input to first capture into Mem1 the system data output from TG1 toMux1, and then shift the captured data out for inspection via the serialoutput. This Sample operation is thus the same as described for the cellof FIG. 4. An example of the FIG. 6 boundary scan cell in Sampleoperation is illustrated in the timing diagram of FIG. 6A.

During Extest operation, Select 2 disables TG1, therefore disabling theIC core logic from outputting data to the latchable output buffer 40.When the boundary scan cell of FIG. 6 is first placed into Extestoperation, the latchable buffer 40 needs to be loaded with the outputfrom Mem1. To achieve this, a preload signal is output on Control 2 andTransfer to cause TG2 and TG3 to be enabled to drive the logic valuefrom Mem1 to the latchable output buffer 40. After preloading thelatchable output buffer, TG2 and TG3 are disabled to allow the latchableoutput buffer to maintain the preloaded logic value at the output pin.

During the capture step of the Extest operation, TG2 is disabled byControl 2 and TG3 is momentarily enabled by Transfer to allow the outputof the latch buffer to be captured into Mem1 via Mux1. After the capturestep, TG3 is disabled and the shifting step of the Extest operation isperformed. The latchable output buffer 40 remains stable during theshifting step via the latch buffer feedback. The momentary enabling ofTG3 by the Transfer signal allows the IC output to be captured as in theprior art boundary scan cell of FIG. 3, but without the overhead of theadditional Mux3 and Select 3 signal required in the FIG. 3 cell. AfterMem1 has completed its capture and shift operation it contains new testdata to be loaded into the latchable output buffer 40. The latchableoutput buffer loads (updates) the new test data from Mem1 in response toa momentary enabling of TG2 and TG3 by the Control 2 and Transfersignals. The latchable output buffer holds the new test data at theoutput pin when TG2 and TG3 are disabled after the data is transferred.

An example of the FIG. 6 boundary scan cell in Extest operation isillustrated in the timing diagram of FIG. 6A. Again, note that thepreload signals on Control 2 and Transfer, described above to initiallytransfer the logic value from Mem1 to the latchable output buffer 40 atthe beginning of the Extest operation, are not shown in the timingdiagram of FIG. 6A, but have already occurred when the Extest operationof FIG. 6A is entered. Also note the bidirectional behavior of TG3during the Extest capture and update operations. During the captureoperation, TG3 is enabled by Transfer to pass data from the latchableoutput buffer 40 to Mem1 via Mux1, while during the update operation,TG3 is enabled by Transfer to pass data from Mem1 to the latchableoutput buffer 40.

During Intest operation in FIG. 6, Select 2 disables TG1, thereforedisabling the IC core logic from outputting data to the latchable outputbuffer 40. When the boundary scan cell of FIG. 6 is first placed intoIntest operation, the latchable output buffer 40 is preloaded with testdata from Mem1 in the same manner as described in the Extest operation.

During the capture step of the Intest operation, TG1 is momentarilyenabled by Select 2 while TG2 and TG3 remain disabled. Momentarilyenabling TG1 allows system data from the IC core logic to be captured inMem1 via Mux1. Since TG3 is disabled, the state of the latchable outputbuffer 40 is maintained during the capture step. After the capture step,TG1 is disabled along with TG2 and TG3 as the captured data is shiftedout of Mem1. The momentary enabling of TG1 by Select 2 allows the IC'ssystem data to be captured and shifted out as described in the Intestoperation of the prior art boundary scan cell of FIGS. 1-3. After Mem1has completed its capture and shift operation it contains new test datato be loaded (updated) into the latchable output buffer 40. Thelatchable output buffer 40 loads the new test data from Mem1 in responseto a momentary enabling of TG2 and TG3 by the Control 2 and Transfersignals. The latchable output buffer 40 holds the new test data at theoutput pin when TG2 and TG3 are again disabled. An example of theboundary scan cell in Intest operation is illustrated in the timingdiagram of FIG. 6A. Again, note that the preload signals on Control 2and Transfer, described above to initially transfer the logic value fromMem1 to the latchable output buffer 40 at the beginning of the Intestoperation, are not shown in the FIG. 6A timing diagram, but already haveoccurred when the Intest operation of FIG. 6A is entered.

While the above described way of loading (updating) Mem1 data into thelatchable output buffer 40 during Extest and Intest is preferred foroutput pin short circuit protection (as will be described later), analternate loading method is possible. The alternate method is similar tothe one described above except that Control 2 for the cell of FIG. 4 andControl 2 and Transfer for the cell of FIG. 6 are activated to enableTG2 of FIG. 4 and TG2 and TG3 of FIG. 6, respectively, immediately whenExtest or Intest is entered. This condition remains in effect duringExtest and Intest except when data is being captured and shifted inMem1. Using this alternate method, TG2 (FIG. 4) or TG2 and TG3 (FIG. 6)output Mem1 test data to the latchable output buffer 40 at all timesexcept when Mem1 is capturing and shifting test data. During capture andshift operations, Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfer are operated asrequired (for example as described above with respect to FIGS. 4 and 6)to cause the appropriate data (output data for Extest or IC data forIntest) to be captured and shifted in Mem1. After the capture and shiftoperation completes, Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfer again enableTG2 or TG2 and TG3 to transfer test data to the latchable output buffer40. Rather than the previously described momentary activation of Control2 or Control 2 and Transfer to pass Mem1 data to the latchable outputbuffer 40, this alternate method uses continuous levels on Control 2 orControl 2 and Transfer to continuously transfer Mem1 data to thelatchable output buffer except during Mem1 capture and shift operations.The operation of Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfer using thisalternate control method is shown in the timing diagrams of FIGS. 4B and6B.

One benefit of using momentary Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfersignals, rather than holding them at enabling levels, is that themomentary activation allows TG2 or TG2 and TG3 to pass test data to thelatchable output buffer 40 during a short period of time, and thenallows the latch buffer to latch and hold the test data at the outputpin. Holding Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfer at enabled statesforces TG2 or TG2 and TG3 to drive test data to the latchable outputbuffer 40 continuously, overriding the short circuit corrective actionof the latch buffer feedback feature.

For example, if a short to ground existed on the IC output pin and themomentary control method were used to transfer a logic one from Mem1 tothe latchable output buffer 40, the latchable output buffer wouldtemporarily force (during the Control 2 or Control 2 and Transfer time)the output to a logic one. However, after the momentary control goesaway, the latchable output buffer 40 would, due to the output feedbackfrom the latch buffer, immediately switch from outputting a logic one tooutputting a logic zero, thus removing the voltage contention at the ICoutput pin. If the alternate (continuous) control method were used tocontinuously transfer a logic one from Mem1 to the latchable outputbuffer 40, the latchable output buffer would attempt to continuouslyforce the shorted output to a logic one for as long as Control 2 orControl 2 and Transfer are set high. The advantage of the momentarycontrol method over the continuous control method then, is that itreduces the time a short circuit (or other voltage contention) conditioncan exist on an output pin, and therefore reduces the possibility of anoutput buffer being damaged or destroyed.

The boundary scan cells of FIGS. 4 and 6 provide improved short circuitprotection over the method employed in prior art FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, theshort circuits to ground or supply voltages (logic zero or one) arecorrected by performing back to back scan operations (Extest 1 andExtest 2). The method of FIG. 3 allows a shorted output to be maintainedfor the number of TCK periods required to go from updating test data inExtest 1 to updating test data in Extest 2. Using the IEEE 1149.1 teststandard timing as an example, a minimum of four TCK periods must occurbetween the above-described Extest 1 and Extest 2 update steps. Usingthe prior art boundary scan cell of FIG. 3, a short circuit will existat an output pin for at least 4 TCK periods. TCK frequencies can rangefrom single step rates of say 1 hertz, to free running rates of say 20megahertz. While a low current output buffer may be able to tolerate ashort of a given duration without complete destruction, a high currentoutput buffer may not. Even if an output buffer appears to operatenormally after being shorted for 4 TCK periods, it may be so degraded bythe short as to significantly reduce its life expectancy in the field,causing early and unexpected system failures. Also, multiple pin shortscan occur, causing multiple output buffers to be stressed between updatesteps, causing heat to build up in the IC.

Using the boundary scan cells of the present invention in FIGS. 4 and 6,the latchable output buffer 40, when used in combination with themomentary control method of Control 2 (FIG. 4) or Control 2 and Transfer(FIG. 6), significantly reduces the time an output buffer can be forcedinto a short circuit condition. For example, the Control 2 or Control 2and Transfer signals can be made to momentarily enable TG2 or TG2 andTG3 for only one half TCK period during update. After the momentaryupdate enable goes away, the latch buffer provides feedback to correctfor any output short condition immediately. In comparing short circuitcorrection times between the boundary scan cell of FIG. 3 (4 TCKperiods) and those of FIGS. 4 and 6 (½ TCK period), the cells of thepresent invention correct shorts in 12.5% of the time it takes the priorart cell to correct shorts. Therefore the invention reduces thepotential for output buffers to be degraded or destroyed during Extestor Intest operation. The reason for this improved short circuitprotection provided by the invention is that the latchable output buffer40 immediately and asynchronously corrects for logic differences betweenthe input and the output of the output buffer using the latch buffer asa feedback mechanism.

When 3-state (3S) output buffers are used in ICs, FIG. 1 prior artboundary scan cells are placed at the data input and at the 3-statecontrol input of the 3-state output buffer, as shown in FIG. 7. Theseboundary scan cells allow inputting system data and 3-state control tothe 3-state buffer.

FIG. 8 shows an example of how a boundary scan cell similar to FIG. 4can be used to control 3-state output buffers. During normal operation,the 3-state (3S) buffer of FIG. 8 is enabled or disabled by the 3Scontrol output from the IC's core logic. In test operation, the 3-statebuffer is enabled or disabled by the test data stored into the latchableoutput buffer 81 of the boundary scan cell 80 of FIG. 8. Note that theboundary scan cell 80 of FIG. 8 uses a normal data buffer 82 to producethe latchable output, instead of using the IC output buffer as shown inFIGS. 4 and 6. The operation of the FIG. 8 cell 80 is the same as inFIG. 4. Although the boundary scan cell 80 uses a normal data buffer 82to create the Mem2 function instead of using the IC output buffer asshown in FIGS. 4 and 6, the cell 80 still requires less logic than theprior are cells in FIGS. 1 and 7, even without using the output bufferas part of the cell.

FIG. 9 shows an example of how the prior art boundary scan cell of FIG.1 is used on IC inputs. During normal IC operation the cell passes datafrom the output of the input buffer to the IC's core logic, via Mux2.During test mode the cell passes test data from Mem2 to the IC's corelogic, via Mux2. In either mode, system data from the input buffer canbe captured and shifted out of Mem1, as previously described withrespect to the Sample operation. During test mode, the cell type of FIG.9 allows holding the input to the IC's core logic at a stable statebetween update operations, via the use of Mem2 and Mux2. This holding ofstable test data is important on asynchronous IC inputs like resets,enables, etc. A known problem with this approach is that the strongoutput drive capability of the input buffer is prevented from beingutilized, since the output of Mux2 drives the core logic. In many casesa large data buffer 90 (shown in dotted lines) is required on the outputof Mux2 to provide the required drive to the core logic. This high drivedata buffer 90 increases logic overhead and introduces an additionaldelay in the input data signal path.

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary boundary scan cell according to thepresent invention implemented at an IC input. The boundary scan cell isshown in two parts. The first part 100 includes Mux1, Mem1, and TG2, andthe second part 101 includes TG1, and a latchable input buffer 103comprising the IC input buffer and a latch buffer. While the circuitelements of the FIG. 10 boundary scan cell can be placed anywhere in theIC, in the FIG. 10 example the first part 100 is implemented in the ICcore logic region, and the second part 101 is implemented in the ICinput buffer region. The Mem2 function of the prior art boundary scancell of FIG. 9 is realized in the input boundary scan cell of FIG. 10 bythe combination of TG2, the IC input buffer, and the latch buffer. Alsothe Mux2 function of the prior art cell of FIG. 9 is realized in FIG. 10by TG1 and TG2.

During Sample, TG1 is enabled by Select 2 to input data to the IC corelogic via the input buffer, and TG2 is disabled by Control 2. Select 1and Control 1 inputs can be applied to allow the data output from TG1 tobe captured and shifted out of Mem1 to provide the Sample operation.During Extest, TG1 is enabled by Select 2 to allow Mem1 to capture andshift out data input to the IC in response to the Select 1 and Control 1signals. During Intest, TG1 is disabled by Select 2 to block externalsignal interference while Mux1, Mem1, and TG2 are operated analogouslyto the previously described cell of FIG. 4 to; (1) capture test datafrom the output of the latchable input buffer 103, (2) shift data fromserial in to serial out, and (3) update new test data to the input ofthe latchable input buffer 103 to be input to the IC core logic. Thelatchable input buffer is preloaded with test data from Mem1 at thebeginning of Intest in the same way that latchable output buffer 40 ispreloaded, as previously described with respect to FIG. 4. The FIG. 10cell allows the input buffer to drive the core logic and thus eliminatesthe need for the additional high drive data buffer 90 of FIG. 9 and thesignal delay it introduces.

In FIG. 11, another exemplary boundary scan cell is implemented at an ICinput. The FIG. 11 boundary scan cell is similar to the one of FIG. 10except that the second part 111 includes TG3 at the input of thelatchable input buffer 103. TG3 allows the FIG. 11 cell to input a safelogic value to the IC core logic during Extest. The Mem2 function of theprior art boundary scan cell of FIG. 9 is realized in the input boundaryscan cell of FIG. 11 by the combination of TG2, TG3, the IC inputbuffer, and the latch buffer. Also the Mux2 function of the prior artcell of FIG. 9 is realized in FIG. 1 by TG1, TG2 and TG3.

During Sample, TG1 and TG3 are enabled by Select 2 and Transfer to inputdata to the IC core logic via the input buffer, and TG2 is disabled byControl 2. Select 1 and Control 1 inputs can be applied to allow thedata output from TG1 to be captured and shifted out of Mem1 to providethe Sample operation. During Extest, TG1 is enabled by Select 2 to allowMem1 to capture and shift out data input to the IC in response to theSelect 1 and Control 1 signals. In Extest, TG3 is disabled by Transferto allow the latchable input buffer 103 to hold stable data to the ICcore logic during capture and shift operations, which prevents the corelogic from seeing the logic input to the input pin during test. TheTransfer signal can be controlled to continuously hold safe data to thecore logic or can be controlled in conjunction with Control 2 and TG2 toupdate new test data from Mem1 to the latchable input buffer 103 at theend of each scan operation. During Intest, TG1 is disabled by Select 2to block external signal interference while Mux1, Mem1, TG2, and TG3 areoperated analogously to the previously described cell of FIG. 6 to; (1)capture test data from the output of the latchable input buffer 103, (2)shift data from serial in to serial out, and (3) update new test data tothe latchable input buffer 103 to be input to the IC core logic. At thebeginning of Intest or Extest, TG2 and TG3 are operated to preload datafrom Mem1 to the latchable input buffer 103 in the same manner thatlatchable output buffer 40 is preloaded, as previously described withrespect to FIG. 6. The input boundary scan cell implementation of FIG.11 allows the input buffer to drive the core logic and thus eliminatesthe need for the additional high drive data buffer 90 of FIG. 9 and thesignal delay it introduces.

The above-described invention thus provides advantages including: inFIG. 4 the combination of TG2, the latch buffer, and the output bufferrealize the Mem2 function of the prior art boundary scan cells,therefore reducing test logic overhead significantly; in FIG. 6 thecombination of TG2 and TG3, the latch buffer, and the output bufferrealize the Mem2 function of the prior art boundary scan cells,therefore reducing test logic overhead significantly; one or both of TG1and TG2 of FIG. 4, and one or more of TG1, TG2, and TG3 of FIG. 6 can beintegrated into the output buffer region of the IC to reduce theboundary scan logic required in the IC's core logic to as little as Mem1and Mux1; in FIG. 4, TG1 and TG2 realize the Mux2 function of the priorart boundary scan cells, therefore reducing test logic overheadsignificantly; in FIG. 6, TG1, TG2 and TG3 realize the Mux2 function ofthe prior art boundary scan cells, therefore reducing test logicoverhead significantly; the boundary scan cells of FIGS. 4 and 6 allowtesting the logic state of the IC output pin, via the latch bufferfeedback path, without having to add a third multiplexer, selectioncontrol and a short Extest operation as required in the prior art cellof FIG. 3; TG3 of FIG. 6 is bidirectional, allowing output pin data tobe passed to Mem1 during Extest capture operations, and allowing Mem1data to be passed to the output pin's latchable output buffer duringExtest or Intest update operations; the latchable output buffer allowsfor immediate and asynchronous correction of voltage level conflicts atthe IC output of the output buffer; a normal data buffer can be used inplace of the IC output buffer to achieve the function of Mem2, as seenin FIG. 8; the output boundary scan cell structures of FIGS. 4 and 6 canbe adapted for use at IC inputs as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11; the Mem2function of prior art input boundary scan cells can be realized by usingeither TG2 and a feedback latch buffer (FIG. 10) or TG2 and a feedbacklatch buffer and TG3 (FIG. 11), in combination with the IC input buffer;the Mux2 function of prior art input boundary scan cells can be realizedby TG1 and TG2 (FIG. 10) or TG1, TG2 and TG3 (FIG. 11); and the inputboundary scan cells of FIGS. 10 and 11 allow the IC input buffer todrive the core logic, eliminating the need for a high drive data bufferon the Mux2 output of prior art cells.

Printed wiring boards and other multi-chip modules which includemultiple ICs are conventionally powered up with the test logic of theICs configured to put the IC in its normal operating mode wherein, forexample, the IC core logic is connected directly to the IC output bufferto drive off of the IC. However, a newly assembled printed wiring boardor other multi-chip module could include defects which cause one or moreIC output pins to be shorted to ground, supply voltage, or other ICpins. If such defects exist at the time of initial power up of the newlyassembled multi-chip module, then the output buffers which drive theshorted IC pins, which output buffers are directly connected to the corelogic of the IC, could be damaged by the short circuits before testingcould be done. The invention therefore provides a structure, method andprocedure for using the boundary scan cells of FIGS. 4 and 6 in a waythat prevents ICs from outputting data on output buffers until testingfor shorts has been performed.

FIG. 12 illustrates a boundary scan cell identical in structure andoperation to the one in FIG. 4, except that TG1 is controlled by asignal output from an AND gate 120 instead of the Select 2 signal. TheAND gate receives two inputs, Select 2 and Disable. All signalspreviously described relative to FIG. 4 operate the same in FIG. 12. TheDisable signal and the AND gate are the differences between FIGS. 4 and12. The AND gate is not a required part of each boundary scan cell, butrather is a single gate whose output is input to plural output boundaryscan cells in the IC.

When the IC is powered up, the Disable signal is set low. The source ofthe Disable signal could be an IC input pin. When Disable is low atpower up, the latchable output buffer 40 is not driven by the IC corelogic, but rather the IC output goes to a stable state in response tofeedback from the latch buffer. If a short to ground existed at the ICoutput, the stable state would be a logic zero. If a short to supplyvoltage existed at the IC output, the stable state would be a logic one.If no short existed, the stable state would be the logic level input bythe latch buffer. The latch buffer could be designed with hysteresis toavoid oscillation of the latchable output buffer 40 when the IC outputis not shorted to ground or supply voltages.

Because the low Disable signal serves only to isolate the core logicfrom the output buffer via TG1, it does not affect the Extest operationas described above relative to FIG. 4. Thus, after the IC has beenpowered up as described, an Extest operation can be performed asdescribed relative to FIG. 4. Once in Extest operation, the boundaryscan cells are operated to test for shorted outputs. It is important tonote that the Extest portion of the boundary scan cell is not disabledby the Disable signal, just TG1. If shorts are detected, they arerepaired. After repairing shorts, or determining the absence of shorts,the IC is placed in normal operation to enable its function, i.e.boundary scan cell set to normal mode and the Disable signal isinactivated. This sequencing from power up, to output disable, to Extestoperation, and then to normal operation (if testing passes) provides away to protect IC outputs from being damaged by the conventional powerup method used with prior art boundary scan cells. This procedureprevents the IC outputs from ever being subjected to voltage contentionsince the output buffers are not driven by the IC's core logic until theExtest operation has been performed to verify that no output shortsexist or to identify shorts for repair.

The Disable signal need only be used on the initial power up of a newlyassembled board containing ICs. After the ICs on the board have beentested for output shorts, the source of the Disable signal (a pin, forexample) can be inactivated or removed so that future power upoperations will cause the IC to enter normal operation immediately.Alternatively, however, the Disable signal can also be used as desired,for example, each time the board is powered up, or selectively when theboard is powered up.

FIG. 13 illustrates how the boundary scan cell of FIG. 6 can be designedto include the safe power up feature. Like the cell in FIG. 12 theDisable signal does not prevent the cell of FIG. 13 from performing theExtest operation, it just disables TG1.

The above-described invention thus provides advantages including: ashort circuit test procedure and protection method for newly assembledboards or multi-chip modules; a Disable feature to allow IC output pinsto go to non-conflicting states on power up; testing for shorts prior toenabling the IC to enter normal operation; a sequence of steps at powerup to insure that no shorts exist on IC output pins; and feedbackdesigned into the IC output buffer, and the ability to disable the corelogic output to enable safe IC power up even with outputs shorted.

FIG. 14 illustrates an alternate output cell design that providesSample, Extest and Intest operations without having to use TG3 of FIG.6, therefore eliminating its delay on signals during both test andnormal IC operation. The output cell of FIG. 14 uses a three inputmultiplexer (Mux1) and additional select control signals (Select Input)instead of the two input Mux1 of FIGS. 4 and 6. Mux1 of FIG. 14 receivesinput from the core logic (system data), input from the latchable outputbuffer 40, and the serial input. Inputting the system data from the corelogic directly to Mux1 eliminates the need for the signal isolationcapability provided by TG3 in FIG. 6 during Intest. In Sample, TG1 ofFIG. 14 is enabled and TG2 is disabled to allow normal system data flow.During Sample operation, Mux1 is controlled to input the system data toMem1 for capturing and shifting out, as previously described. In Extest,TG1 of FIG. 14 is disabled and TG2 is operated as previously describedto update test data to the latchable output buffer 40. During Extestoperation, Mux1 is controlled to input the output pin data to Mem1 forcapturing and shifting out, as previously described. In Intest, TG1 ofFIG. 14 is disabled and TG2 is operated as previously described toupdate test data to the latchable output buffer. During Intestoperation, Mux1 is controlled to input the system data to Mem1 forcapturing and shifting out, as previously described.

In the exemplary cell of FIG. 14, the capturing of system and test datasignals during Sample and Intest does not require passing the signalsthrough TG1, whereas the cells of FIGS. 4 and 6 can capture and shiftout system and test data signals that respectively pass through TG1during Sample and Intest operations, which verifies the TG1 signal path.However, a special TG1 path test operation can be defined to allow Mux1of FIG. 14 to capture and shift out system or test data from the outputof TG1.

FIG. 15 illustrates an alternate input cell design that provides Sample,Extest and Intest operations without having to use TG3 of FIG. 11,therefore eliminating its delay on signals during both test and normalIC operation. The input cell of FIG. 15 uses a three input multiplexer(Mux1) and additional select control signals (Select Input) instead ofthe two input Mux1 of the FIGS. 10-11. Mux1 of FIG. 15 receives inputfrom the input pin, input from the input of the latchable input buffer103, and the serial input. Inputting the input pin data directly to Mux1eliminates the need for the signal isolation capability provided by TG3in FIG. 11 during Extest, since in the cell arrangement of FIG. 15, TG1provides that function. In Sample, TG1 of FIG. 15 is enabled and TG2 isdisabled to allow normal system data flow. During Sample operation, Mux1is controlled to input data from the latchable input buffer 103 to Mem1for capturing and shifting out, as previously described In Extest, TG1of FIG. 15 is disabled and TG2 is operated to update test data from Mem1to the latchable input buffer, as previously described with respect toFIG. 11. During Extest operation, Mux1 is controlled to input the inputpin data to Mem1 for capturing and shifting out, as previouslydescribed. In Intest, TG1 of FIG. 15 is disabled and TG2 is operated toupdate test data from Mem1 to the latchable input buffer 103, aspreviously described. During Intest operation, Mux1 is controlled toinput system data from the output of the latchable input buffer 103 toMem1 for capturing and shifting out, as previously described withrespect to FIG. 11.

In FIG. 16, a cell similar to that of FIG. 15 is shown having separateconnections for coupling the output of TG2 to the input of the latchableinput buffer 103 and for coupling the output of the latchable inputbuffer to the input to Mux1. The operation of the cell is the same as inFIG. 15. The only difference is that the data update operation from Mem1to the latchable input buffer (via TG2) and the data capture operationfrom the latchable input buffer to Mem1 occur over separate connections(i.e. separate and distinct signal paths) instead of over the sameconnection (i.e. a shared signal path) as shown in the cell of FIG. 15.In FIG. 15, the data output from the latchable input buffer 103 iscaptured into Mem1 via the feedback path through the latch buffer,whereas in FIG. 16 the data output from the latchable input buffer 103is captured into Mem1 via the direct connection between the output ofthe latchable input buffer and Mux1. Some exemplary advantages of theseparate connections for updating data to and capturing data from thelatchable input buffer are: (1) ability to test the input buffer sincethe input is controllable and the output is observable via separateconnections to the Mux1/Mem1/TG2 test circuitry, and (2) reduction ofthe load driven by TG1 (Mux1 input is removed from this load), whichimproves input signaling performance from the input pin, through TG1, tothe latchable input buffer 103.

The input and output cells of FIGS. 14, 15 and 16 provide the sameadvantages as stated for the cells of FIGS. 4, 6, 10 and 11. The outputcell of FIG. 14 can also be controlled as described with respect to theoutput cell in FIG. 12 to provide power up short protection.

Although exemplary embodiments of the present invention are describedabove, this description does not limit the scope of the invention, whichcan be practiced in a variety of embodiments.

1. An integrated circuit, comprising: A. core logic having a system dataoutput; B. a first switch having an input connected to the system dataoutput, a select input connected to a first select lead, and an output;C. an output buffer having an input connected to the output of the firstswitch and an output; D. a latch buffer having an input connected to theoutput of the output buffer and an output connected to the input of theoutput buffer; E. a serial data input lead; F. a multiplexer having afirst data input connected to the serial data input lead, a second datainput connected to the input of the output buffer, a select inputconnected to a second select lead, and an output; G. a memory circuithaving an input connected to the output of the multiplexer, a controlinput connected to a first control lead, and an output; H. a serial dataoutput lead connected to the output of the memory circuit; and I. asecond switch having an input connected to the output of the memorycircuit, a control input connected to a second control lead, and anoutput connected to the input of the output buffer.
 2. The integratedcircuit of claim 1 in which the latch buffer is weak enough so that theoutput of either the first or second switch can overdrive the output ofthe latch buffer.
 3. The integrated circuit of claim 1 in which at leastone of the first and second switches are transmission gates.
 4. Theintegrated circuit of claim 1 in which at least one of the first andsecond switches is a tri-state buffer.
 5. The integrated circuit ofclaim 1 including a serial scan path scan cell that includes the firstand second switches, the multiplexer, the memory circuit, and the serialinput and output leads.
 6. The integrated circuit of claim 5 in whichthe scan cell has only one multiplexer and one memory circuit.
 7. Theintegrated circuit of claim 1 in which the multiplexer has only thefirst and second data inputs.
 8. The integrated circuit of claim 1including a serial scan path boundary scan cell that includes the firstand second switches, the multiplexer, the memory circuit, and the serialinput and output leads.